Selection of Social Work Students: A Literature Review of Selection Criteria and Process Effectiveness
Keywords:
Social work education, Student selection, Fit-and-proper, Admission, SuccessAbstract
This article is a review of international literature on the effectiveness of student selection processes for social work programmes. Adopting a narrative and thematic approach, we present findings from research considering whether programmes are selecting capable students, or whether there is, in fact, little or no predictive reliability between selection criteria and eventual student success. A focus on selection criteria fits within a broader context of the factors that contribute to the success of students in completing their social work programme and in their future practice. Findings suggest that there is no simple formula for selecting students who will go on to complete their social work programme, and that many of the tools used during the selection process are unreliable predictors of eventual student success. Findings also indicate that existing research is limited; further research is needed, particularly on the value of specific selection tools and measures. This article also highlights related issues that require attention, namely inherent tensions between: the values of the social work profession, which promotes diversity and life experience; the academic requirements that inform selection processes; selection bias and student recruitment; the impact of an increasingly regulated profession; and the challenges that arise when we get it wrong.
References
Anand, M. (2009). Gender in social work education and practice in India. Social Work Education, 28(1), 96–105. doi:10.1080/02615470802404226
Aotearoa New Zealand Association of Social Workers. (2013). Code of ethics: Ko te tauãkì tikanga (3rd ed.). Christchurch, NZ: Author.
Apaitia-Vague, T., Pitt, L., & Younger, D. (2011). “Fit and proper” and fieldwork: A dilemma for social work educators?
Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work Review, 23(4), 55–64.
Beddoe, L. (2007). Change, complexity, and challenge in social work education in Aotearoa, New Zealand. Australian Social Work, 60(1), 46–55. doi:10.1080/03124070601166703
Beddoe, L., & Duke, J. (2009). Registration in New Zealand social work: The challenge of change. International Social Work, 52(6), 785–797. doi:10.1177/0020872809342649
Campbell, J., Campbell, A., & Das, C. (2013). A study of successful applicants’ views of a social work admission process.
Journal of Social Work 13(4), 382–399. doi:10.1177/1468017311434876
Conlon, P., Hecker, K., & Sabatini, S. (2012). What should we be selecting for? A systematic approach for determining which personal characteristics to assess for during admissions. BMC Medical Education, 12, 105–115.
Cornelissen, J. J., & van Wyk, A. S. (2007). Professional socialisation: An influence on professional development and role definition. South African Journal of Higher Education, 21(7), 826–841.
Curtis, E., Wikaire, E., Stokes, K., & Reid, P. (2012). Addressing indigenous health workforce inequities: A literature review exploring “best” practice for recruitment into tertiary health programmes. Journal for Equity in Health, 11(13), 1–16.
Dillon, J. (2007). The conundrum of balancing widening participation with the selection of suitable students for social work education. Social Work Educaton, 26(8), 827–841.
Engler, R. (2010). Academic performance of first-year bachelors students at university. Wellington, NZ: Ministry of Education.
Furness, S., & Gilligan, P. (2004). Fit for purpose: Issues from practice placements, practice teaching and the assessment of students’ practice. Social Work Education, 23(4), 465–479.
Gaubatz, M. D., & Vera, E. (2002). Do formalized gatekeeping procedures increase programs follow-up with deficient trainees?
Counselor Education & Supervision, 41, 294–305.
Gibbons, J., Bore M., Munro, R., & Powis, D. (2007). Using personal quality assessment for selection of social work students.
Australian Social Work, 60(2), 210–221.
Griffith University. (2009). Operation student success: Griffith’s student retention strategy 2012-2014. Brisbane, QLD: Griffith University. Retrieved from http://www.griffith.edu.au/learning-teaching/student-success/retention-and-student-success.
Holmstrom, C. (2013). Suitability for professional practice: Assessing and developing moral character in social work education.
Social Work Education, 33(4), 451–468.
Holmstrom, C., & Taylor, I. (2008a). Mapping the terrain of selection for social work: A critical analysis of policy, theory and research. Social Work Education, 27(5), 519–535.
Holmstrom, C., & Taylor, I. (2008b). Researching admissions: What can we learn about selection of applicants from findings about students in difficulty on a social work programme? Social Work Education, 27(8), 819–836.
Jones, K. (2004). Mission drift in qualitative research, or moving toward a systematic review of qualitative studies, moving back to a more systematic narrative review. The Qualitative Report, 9(1), 95–112.
Karger, H. (2012). Lessons from American social work education: Caution ahead. Australian Social Work, 65(3), 311–325. doi:10
.1080/0312407X.2012.678498
Lafrance, J., Gray, E., & Herbert, M. (2004). Gate-keeping for professional social work practice. Social Work Education, 23 (3), 325–340.
Long, M., Ferrier, F., & Heagney, M. (2006). Stay, play or give it away? Students continuing, changing or leaving university study in first year. Melbourne, VIC: Monash University.
Manktelow, R., & Lewis, C. A. (2006). A study of the personality attributes of applicants for postgraduate social work training to a Northern Ireland university. Social Work Education, 24(3), 297–309.
Manthorpe, J., Moriarty, J., Hussein, S., Stevens, M., Sharpe, E., Orme, J., … Crisp, B. R. (2010). Changes in admission work arising from the new social work degree in England. Social Work Education, 29(7), 704–717.
Mercer, A., & Puddey, I. B. (2011). Admission selection criteria as predictors of outcomes in an undergraduate medical course: A prospective study. Medical Teacher, 33, 997–1004.
Ministry of Education. (2013). The Mãori education strategy: Ka hikitia – Strategy overview – Introduction to ka hikitia – Accelerating success 2013–2017. Wellington, NZ: Author.
Moriarty, J., & Manthorpe, J. (2014). Post-qualifying education for social workers: A continuing problem or a new opportunity?
Social Work Education, 33(3), 397–411. doi:10.1080/02615479.2013.806468
Moriarty, J., Manthorpe, J., Chauhan, B., Jones, G., Wenman, H., & Hussein, S. (2009). “Hanging on a little thin line”: Barriers to progression and retention in social work education. Social Work Education, 28(4), 363–379.
Moxley, D. P., Najor-Durack, A., & Dumbrigue, C. Y. (2000). Seven strategies for facilitating access of non-traditional students to graduate education in social work. Social Work Education, 19(4), 335–348.
Pelech, W., Stalker, C., Regehr, C., & Jacobs, M. (1999). Making the grade: The quest for validity in admissions decisions.
Journal of Social Work Education, 35(2), 215–226.
Poole, P., Moriarty, H., Wearn, A., Wilkinson, T., & Weller, J. (2009). Medical student selection in NZ: Looking to the future.
New Zealand Medical Journal, 122(1306), 88–100.
Poole, P., Shulruf, B., Harley, B., Monigatti, J., Barrow, M., Reid, P., … Bagg, W. (2012). Shedding light on the decision to retain an interview for medical student selection. New Zealand Medical Journal, 125(1361), 81–88.
Puddey, I., B., Mercer, A., Carr, S., & Louden, W. (2011). Potential influence of selection criteria on the demographic composition of students in an Australian medical school. BMC Medical Education, 11, 97. doi:10.1186/1472-6920-11-97
Redmond, B., Guerin, S., & Devitt, C. (2008). Attitudes, perceptions and concerns of student social workers: First two years of a longitudinal study. Social Work Education, 27(8), 868–882.
Rennie, G. (2013). Registration ten years on: A perspective from a social work educator. Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work, 25(3), 3–10.
Ross, E. (2010). Selection tests and social justice: A profile of applicants seeking admission to the social work undergraduate degree at a South African University. Social Work Education, 29(5), 459–474. doi:10.1080/02615470903177630
Ryan, M., Cleak, H., & McCormack, J. (2006). Student performance in field education placements: The findings of a 6 year Australian study of admissions data. Journal of Social Work Education 42(1), 66–84.
Social Workers Registration Board (SWRB). (2013). The process for recognition/re-recogntion of social work qualifications in New Zealand. Wellington, NZ: Author.
Sowbel, L. (2012). Gatekeeping: Why shouldn’t we be ambivalent? Journal of Social Work Education, 48(1), 27–44.
Sowbel, L. R., & Miller, S. E. (2015). Gatekeeping in graduate social work education: Should personality traits be considered?
Social Work Education, 34(1), 110–124. doi:10.1080/02615479.2014.953046
van Heugten, K. (2011). Registration and social work education: A golden opportunity or a Trojan horse? Journal of Social Work, 11(2), 174–190. doi: 10.1177/1468017310386695
Watson, D. (2002). Just a paper exercise? Social Work Education, 21(1), 79–89.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2016 Australian and New Zealand Social Work and Welfare Education and Research
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Advances in Social Work & Welfare Education by Australian and New Zealand Social Work and Welfare Education and Research (ANZSWWER) is licensed under CC BY 4.0
